Kristi Gibson, Bret Michaels engaged

Kristi Gibson and Bret Michaels have decided to make it official.

MTV reports that Michaels proposed to long-time girlfriend Gibson on his latest reality show “Bret Michaels: Life As I Know It.” The couple—who have been together off and on for 16 years—have two daughters together, and the couple reexamined their relationship following Michaels’ brain hemorrhage earlier this year.
Michaels was recently tossed into the spotlight when rumors surfaced that he was behind Tish and Billy Ray Cyrus’ divorce. Michaels denied over and over again, however, that he had never had an affair with Tish Cyrus and that he is simply friends with the family.

Miley Cyrus' Divorcing Parents Put House Up For Sale

Miley Cyrus' parents, Tish and Billy Ray Cyrus, are reportedly selling their marital home. The singer and his wife have put their multimillion-dollar Toluca Lake, California, house on the market, according to Gossip Cop.

The couple is asking for more than $7 million for the home. The website also reports that Tish has been looking at homes in Encino since she announced her split from Billy Ray in October. The news comes at the same time it was announced that family friend Bret Michaels popped the question to longtime girlfriend Kristi Gibson.

Michaels was rumored to be the cause of the split between Tish and Billy Ray as speculation swirled that he had an affair with Miley's mom. Michaels, who recorded several songs with Miley, denied any wrongdoing.

"The answer is no," the singer said when he appeared on "Fox & Friends." "I've been friends with her family forever. ... It started out with me and Miley simply working on a song together. Her mom, Tish, likes 'Every Rose Has Its Thorn,' the first concert Miley ever saw was Poison, and so they wanted to remake it for the new record. ... When I was in the studio, Miley came in and sang on my song ... and that was it."

Miley has been busy working on her latest film, "So Undercover," and was recently spotted shopping in New Orleans during a break from filming. According to E!, the teen star was spotted at Saks Fifth Avenue with makeup artist Denika Bedrossian. The singer also reportedly added to her tattoo collection with Bedrossian.

Bret Michaels: Engaged to Kristi Gibson!

After 16 years together, or at least sort of together (when he wasn't on Rock of Love or putting it to Tish Cyrus), Bret Michals and Kristi Gibson are engaged!

Bret proposed to Kristi - where else - on the finale of Bret Michaels: Life As I Know It on VH1. Gibson is the mother of his daughters Raine, 10, and Jorja, 5.

Down on one knee, the Poison frontman said, "Please say yes or the rejection will kill me right now." Fortunately for all of us, Gibson responded positively!
Gibson and their daughters stayed by Bret Michaels' side earlier this year when he suffered a terrifying brain hemorrhage and then a subsequent stroke.

"She's the one who put up with me all these years," Bret, who hinted this summer that he might finally put a ring on it, told Us Magazine of Kristi.

Immediately after Gibson accepted his proposal, he broke the happy news to the girls: "[I told them] 'I did it! We'll all be together forever! Family hug!'"

Aww. How can that not make you smile? Congratulations, Bret.

Census 2010: We ran a tight ship (Commerce Secretary Gary Locke)

Secretary Gary Locke delivered the following remarks earlier today at the National Press Club:

Thank you, Dr. Blank and good morning, everyone!

This is an important day for the American people.

Earlier this morning -- in accordance with the law and in fulfillment of a Constitutional mandate – I delivered the 2010 Census findings to the President of the United States. This is a ritual that has occurred only 22 other times in American history.

My report to the president included the national and state populations; and apportionment of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives based on the official population count of the 2010 Census.

I told the president that the 2010 Census was completed on time and without spending the full amount Congress allotted for the task.

Before we get to the actual numbers, it is important to stress this achievement – because it demonstrates that government can deliver on a promise on time and under budget.

Before this Census began, experts inside and outside the government predicted that long-standing operational and fiscal problems at the U.S. Census Bureau would doom the 2010 count to cost overruns and diminished participation by the American people.

In 2009, the Commerce Department’s own Inspector General, as well as the Government Accountability Office, ranked the 2010 Census as one of the federal government programs most likely to fail.

That did not happen.

Earlier this summer, I joined Dr. Groves to announce the Census Bureau had spent $1.6 billion less than it was appropriated for 2010 Census operations. Today, with the final accounting completed, I am very pleased to announce that number has grown to $1.87 billion – which represents more than 25 percent of the total Congress allotted in 2010 for spending on the Decennial Census.

At least half of this budgetary accomplishment can be directly attributed to:

    * Better management;

    * Better productivity among our Census counters; and

    * Our successful effort to get more Americans to mail back their census forms, which reduced the number of Census employees we had to hire to go counting door to door.

The other half of the $1.87 billion is from a reserve fund that we had set aside to deal with operational problems and other unforeseen circumstances that fortunately never arose.

Ultimately, 74 percent of U.S. households returned the Census questionnaire by mail, matching what was achieved in the 2000 Census, and halting a three decade decline in mail back response since 1970.

These are substantial achievements that did not happen by chance.

The senior management at the Department of Commerce and the Census Bureau leadership ran a tight ship.

We demanded accountability, instituted rigorous internal management reforms and constant monitoring; and we made sure that we stretched every taxpayer dollar as far as it could go.

We also revamped our public outreach efforts. Our advertising was more targeted than it had ever been before, with:

    * Concentrated advertising in Hard-to-Count areas; and

    * Advertising in more languages.

We also set aside resources to rapidly intervene with targeted advertising in markets with lagging response rates.

The impact of this targeting effort was measurable and immediate.

In late March of this past year, the Census Bureau had identified 23 media markets containing a total of 17.7 million households that seriously lagged in response.

After three weeks of more intensive and targeted advertising, low performers were reduced to just 10 markets with 1.6 million households.

Of course, we could not have realized these savings without the American public’s impressive participation in the 2010 Census.

We would like to express our sincere thanks to all those who returned the questionnaire or took a few minutes to answer the few simple questions from the 600,000 Census workers who followed up with households that did not return a questionnaire.

You have helped us to paint this latest portrait of America, which we will start showing you today.

The 2010 Census has been a priority of mine since my very first day as Commerce Secretary.

In fact, the very first thing I did as secretary, before even setting foot in the Commerce Department building, was to attend a kickoff meeting with 2010 Census national partners.

For the 2010 Census, there were more than 257,000 partner organizations all across the country which joined with the Census Bureau to inform and motivate their communities to participate.

These partners ranged from community groups and non-profit organizations to businesses large and small, and they are represented here today.

They also deserve our heartfelt thanks for their support and commitment.

Much is riding on the results we announce today.

This Census data will determine how more than $400 billion is allocated every single year, and for the next ten years, to local communities for everything from education, to senior services, to police and roads.

The 2010 Census will also shape the makeup of state legislatures and the U.S. Congress, as Census data will serve as the basis for the redistricting that states will undertake in 2011.

Our business colleagues also benefit enormously from Census data. It provides vital information that they use to identify new markets, to decide where to make major capital investments, and ultimately to create jobs and grow our economy.

Indeed, the Census and other statistics collected by the Census Bureau will serve as a backbone of our economy for years to come.

Again, it’s a real pleasure to be here on this important day for our nation.

Now, what you have all been waiting for. If Bob will please rejoin me, we’ll get to the news.

Census 2010 results: Republicans' second big win of the year?

For Republicans, 2010 is shaping up as a vintage year. First, in the midterm elections they won back control of the House and made big gains in the Senate. Now the 2010 census results have delivered more good news for the party: Most of the states that will gain House seats as the result of population growth lean to the GOP.
Twelve seats will shift as a result of the 2010 results, said Census Bureau director Robert Groves on Tuesday. Texas will gain four new representatives, and Florida will get two, while Arizona, Georgia, Nevada, South Carolina, Utah, and Washington will gain one each.

Of these winners, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, Texas, and Utah are red states, according to political scientist Charlie Cook’s Partisan Voting Index, which measures how strongly state populations are attracted to one party or another.

Nevada is a blue state – but barely so, according to the Partisan Voting Index. Only Washington among the gainers of seats is solidly Democratic.

States losing representatives, by contrast, disproportionately lean Democratic. Those who will have fewer House members are Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania.

New York, a Democratic state, will lose two seats. So will Ohio, a classic swing state that the PVI rates as slightly Republican. All the remaining states that face subtraction of House lawmakers are blue, except for Missouri and Louisiana.

The number of congressional representatives in all other states will remain unchanged.

The trend in which the nation’s population drifts toward GOP-dominated states is not a new one, of course. Texas, for instance, has gained seats as a result of each of the last seven population counts. It reflects the larger demographic trend in which US residents are moving to America’s warmer climes.

In the 2010 results “we see the continuation of the multidecade trend of growth in the nation’s southern and western regions,” said Census Bureau chief Groves.

This decade, for instance, marks the first time in US history that the West, as a region, counts as more populous than the Midwest.

The presumptive new GOP House Speaker, John Boehner, isn’t going to see reinforcements from these numbers right away. The process whereby states set new congressional district lines, called redistricting, can be lengthy and contentious.

Starting next year, the states will use computer-generated maps reflecting voting data to carve out the new districts. Just because a state is Republican does not ensure new districts will vote Republican – that depends on where population growth occurred within the state, for one thing. Sometimes states just quietly agree to protect incumbents of both parties as much as possible, for another.

Plus, the Voting Rights Act is supposed to protect against the dilution of minority votes.

But the GOP will almost certainly come out of the process a net winner, given the preponderance of Republican states that get to add representatives.

2010 Census: Poorest Counties In America

2010 Census: Poorest Counties In America


Read More: 2010 Census, 2010 Census Data, 2010 Census Results, American Community Survey, Census, Census 2010, Census Results 2010, Poor Areas, Poor Counties, Poorest Areas In America, Poorest Counties, Rich Counties, Richest Areas, Richest Areas In America, Richest Counties, Richest Counties In America, Slidepollajax, Business News

Since 2000 the poorest Americans have only gotten poorer.

Though census results are only beginning to be released, last week the results of the American Community Survey were revealed. The ACS details data such as languages spoken in a home and income levels. The data comes from surveys mailed to three million addresses from January 2005 to December 2009, according to ABC News.

Southeastern Kentucky was home to four of the nation's poorest counties. The country's poorest county saw its median income drop $1,500 since 2000, ABC News reported.

Northeast Virginia led the nation in income, as it was home to 4 of the top 10 earning cities. The top richest county saw a median income increase of almost $17,000 since 200.

For a list of the richest counties in America, click here.

To find out more about your neighborhood, visit http://factfinder.census.gov.

Federer picks up Nadal from airport; rivals hang out in Zurich

In the greatest tennis carpool ever, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal drove together to an exhibition match in Zurich. Federer picked up the world's top-ranked player at the airport and took a jaunt through downtown before heading to the stadium.

Nadal arrived in Switzerland on Tuesday morning for the first of two exhibition matches this week with Federer, his long-time rival. He was met on the airport runway by the all-time winningest Grand Slam champion and then hopped in Fed's red Mercedes SLS AMG with gullwing doors (retail price: around $200,000).

[Rewind: Nadal's $500,000 watch stolen from locker]

The world's top-ranked players are competing in an exhibition on Tuesday afternoon in Zurich and then will fly to Madrid for another exhibition in Nadal's native Spain on Wednesday. Both matches will be broadcast by ESPN2 (Tuesday, 2:30 p.m. ET; Wednesday, 1 p.m. ET). Proceeds from the exhibitions will go the players' respective charities.

These sorts of matches are great for the sport and it should be an enjoyable event to watch. Some will try to take meaning from the results, but those will be just as important as the final score of a preseason football game. It's meaningless, frivolous fun. Expect two three-setters (gotta give the fans their money's worth) and for each man to win the match in his homeland.

[Related: Tennis great predicts Nadal will top Federer]

But forget all that. I'm more interested in this Federer airport pickup. It's like Nadal is his Keith Hernandez. What do you think these two talked about while driving down the streets of Zurich? (Closes eyes and imagines the conversation, as twinkly music plays in the background.)

    (silence)

    Nadal: "Did you watch the Davis Cup."

    Federer: "Not really, no."

    Nadal: "Me neither."

    (more silence)

    Federer: "So, uh, how's Spain."

    Nadal: "Good, good."

    (longer silence)

    Nadal: "How are the twins?"

    Federer: "They're good. They're good. Getting to that really, really cute age."

    (even longer silence)

    Federer: "Man, that Sampras is an idiot."

    Nadal: (loudly) "I know, right!"

    (give high-fives)

Apple Pulls Unofficial WikiLeaks App For Being “Harmful”

Add another company to those disassociating themselves from WikiLeaks: Apple. Today, the technology giant removed an iPhone and iPad app from the App Store that allowed users to check out content from the WikiLeaks site as well as follow its Twitter account.

According to The New York Times, Apple’s reasoning for nixing the app was as follows: “Trudy Muller, an Apple spokeswoman, said the company had removed the app ‘because it violated our developer guidelines.’ Ms. Muller added: ‘Apps must comply with all local laws and may not put an individual or group in harm’s way.’”

Apparently, the WikiLeaks content itself was more of an issue to Apple than the fact that the app — created by developer Igor Barinov — was unofficial and charged users $1.99 for content that’s readily available for free elsewhere.

The move makes sense given both WikiLeaks’ and Apple’s track records. WikiLeaks has been the victim of DDoS attacks ever since it started releasing secret embassy cables, and several U.S.-based web companies, including Amazon, PayPal, and its DNS service provider, EveryDNS.net, have denied WikiLeaks service. Bank of America was the most recent company to take an anti-WikiLeaks stand. The site is now functioning mostly as a series of mirrors set up by sympathizers around the globe, but it’s still releasing new secret cables on a daily basis.

Apple, for its part, is known for the strict limitations it puts on developers who sell apps in its store. On-demand music service Grooveshark was pulled from the store amid record label complaints, Esquire’s November issue (featuring revealing pictures of “sexiest woman alive” Minka Kelly) was barred from the store for a spell for being too sexy, and a Pulitzer Prize winner’s satirical app was similarly rejected.

What do you think of WikiLeaks getting the heave-ho?

Konami has launching the 3D Game for Android

Konami has announced the first 3D game which is presented for handheld devices. Instead of waiting for the presence of Nintendo 3DS, Konami announced the game for a mobile phone from Sharp.

Quoted from Tech Radar, Tuesday (21/12/2010), the game was called Mobile Powerful Pro Baseball 3D. He was created Konami for mobile devices such as mobile phones.

The plan, the game will be presented in 3D-enabled phones as well as tablets Sharp Galapagos. Konami is reportedly going to bundle its 3D games on Android devices.

No wonder, because Sharp is a supplier of autostereoscopic screens that will be used Nintendo 3DS. Could be, Konami would glance at it to try out games before finally landing in besutannya Nintendo 3DS.

Galapagos will use Qualcomm's Snapdragon 1GHz processor, operating system Android 2.2 (Froyo) and screens with 3D capability sized 3.8-inch (resolution of 800 x 480).

The New Mitt: Same as the Old Mitt

A WHILE back, an article about the Romney camp’s post-mortem on Mitt’s 2008 presidential run caught my eye.
Upon reflection, some members of Team Romney had apparently come to the conclusion that the Mittster had tried too hard to appeal (read: pander) to the conservative purists. Next time, some suggested, Romney would play to his strengths, establishing himself as a smart, pragmatic, solutions-oriented Mr. Fix-It.

Granted, it seemed to have taken Mitt’s inner circle an awful long time to arrive at the obvious. Still, the piece was encouraging to those who over the years have admired Romney in his various non-right-wing, non-pandering personae. His managerial talents are undeniable; they could prove a strong campaign calling card if Romney can keep his next run from becoming another credibility-eroding exercise in self-caricature. Which could be done if Romney and his team finally decide who he truly is — and apply some super-strength fixative to that identity. A difficult challenge, given the endlessly malleable and morphing Mitt of the last election cycle? No doubt. Still, in a world where scientists have succeeded in isolating and capturing anti-matter, however fleetingly, it’s surely not an impossible one.

So I’ve kept a watchful eye on the putatively non-pandering, serious, big-thinking, solution-seeking new Mitt. As far as Romney-watching goes, December has been a month to remember. Alas, it’s my sad duty to report that something seems to be amiss.

Exhibit A: Earlier this month, Romney came out against the new nuclear arms control treaty the Obama administration has negotiated with Russia. That’s odd, given the array of respected foreign-policy experts who have blessed the treaty. That list includes luminaries like George H.W. Bush. And Brent Scowcroft, who served as national security adviser to both Gerald Ford and that President Bush. And James Baker, Bush’s secretary of state. And George Shultz, secretary of state under Ronald Reagan. And Henry Kissinger, national security adviser and secretary of state during the Nixon-Ford years.

What’s more, the treaty now appears to have enough Republican senators aboard to win the two-thirds vote it needs in the Senate. So who is opposed? Mostly hard-core conservatives — the kind the New Mitt wasn’t going to pander to.

Next, Romney denounced the tax cut deal congressional Republicans cut with President Obama.

Could it be that, ace budgeteer that he is, Romney judged it unaffordable in a time of huge deficits? No, his objection was that the political pact didn’t make the Bush tax cuts permanent. Mind you, Mitt did mention the deficit, but only as ammunition for extending the tax cuts forever.

“In many cases,’’ he wrote in USA Today on Tuesday, “lowering taxes can actually increase government revenues . . . But . . . because the tax deal is temporary, a large portion of this beneficent effect is missing.’’

Actually, the assertion that income tax cuts garner the government more revenue than they cost is closer to theology than to economics. There’s widespread agreement among credible economists that, at anything near our current rates of taxation, income tax cuts do not pay for themselves.

A man as smart as Romney surely knows that. Yet by applying a dollop of supply-side snake-oil, he turned professed concern about the deficit into a disingenuous argument for a tax-cutting position whose consequences would be even more debt.

Topping it all off, Romney’s camp next announced Mitt agreed with US District Judge Henry Hudson that the individual mandate in President Obama’s new health care law is unconstitutional. But wait, wasn’t ObamaCare modeled on RomneyCare? And doesn’t RomneyCare have a similar requirement?

Now, when it comes to verbal escapes, Slick Willard, Mitt’s dodgy doppelganger, is a virtual Houdini. So you won’t want to miss the hair-splitting it will take for him to inveigh against the federal law even as he defends the state statute that served as its model.

Still, for those eagerly awaiting the new, improved 2012 Romney, a word of caution: Don’t get your hopes too high. So far, the prototype suffers from many of the same flaws that plagued the 2008 model Mitt.

Scot Lehigh can be reached at lehigh@globe.com.
opinion of boston globe December 17 2010

A courageous vote


THE BOSTON School Committee deserves a medal for bravery. After an hours-long barrage of threats, insults, and interruptions Wednesday night, the seven members of the board voted unanimously to close or merge 18 schools because they knew it was the only way to save more than 100 others from massive, across-the-board budget cuts that would eviscerate every classroom in the city.
Each school board member, in turn, faced hundreds of angry parents, students, and teachers to describe how they had arrived at this painful, but necessary decision. Marbled throughout the crowd were blow-ins from fringe political groups, who tried their best to intimidate the board and incite the crowd, deriding school board members as “stooges’’ and tools of “parasitical financial institutions.’’ It was all political theater for these throwbacks to the 1960s. But for the hundreds of parents, teachers, and students who came to make last minute appeals to spare their schools, it was as real as a padlocked door on a school they consider a second home.

With 5,600 empty seats in the city’s schools and a projected $63 million budget shortfall for next year, school Superintendent Carol Johnson has no choice but to take funds now used for unneeded buildings and apply them to classroom improvements and teacher training. The school board members listened carefully to the appeals of distraught parents and students from some of the low-performing schools on the closure list. They responded with their heads, not their hearts.

Voting “yes,’’ for the closure plan, school board member Michael O’Neill spoke of going door-to-door at the State House for an increase in school aid. But now, he said, it would be a “dream allocation,’’ if Boston can even maintain its current level of state support.

Voting “yes,’’ board member John Barros said he needed to make sure that the “core of the organization“ remains “strong and functioning.’’

Voting “yes,’’ member Mary Tamer said, “It’s not about one child or one school,’’ but “the greater good of 56,000 students.’’

Voting “yes,’’ member Marchelle Raynor described how she had made a decision in an earlier round of cuts to close her own granddaughter’s school in the interest of protecting the entire system. “That’s cold,’’ yelled an audience member. Actually, it was courageous.

Voting “yes,’’ member Alfreda Harris used her time to shore up Johnson, who earlier had been verbally pummeled by the crowd when she presented her justifications for the closures.

Voting “yes,’’ board chair Rev. Gregory Groover said that such tough decisions presaged a day when every Boston student could attend a top-notch school. “Sellout,’’ called out a heckler.

The constant verbal abuse from the audience would get the better of school board member Claudio Martinez. His eyes narrowing like a fighter’s, Martinez turned on one especially obnoxious protester who had been howling like a banshee and bouncing around the English High School auditorium like a billiard ball.

“When I need a comment from a white, privileged kid like you, I’ll let you know,’’ said Martinez, who has devoted his professional life to improving the lives of low-income students in the city’s Jamaica Plain neighborhood.

Tossing a racial quote into this combustible mix won’t go down as one of Martinez’s finest public moments. But there’s a limit to the amount of verbal abuse anyone can take.

“I probably would have done the same thing,’’ said Mayor Menino in defense of his appointed school board member.

Menino received plenty of criticism from the crowd for his speech the previous day at the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, where he defended the cuts and called on the teachers’ union to adopt reforms, such as longer school days. It was exactly the right audience, however — the future employers of the graduates of the Boston Public Schools.

The meeting ended with several teachers in tears, hugging their colleagues. And more tears are on the way. The closures approved on Wednesday address only about a quarter of the excess seating capacity in the system, according to the nonprofit Boston Municipal Research Bureau.

Boston’s school system is shrinking, a result of decades of erratic quality, demographic change, and, more recently, increased competition from charter schools. But the school committee and school superintendent should be commended for standing tall and saying — unanimously — that they will make this right.

Lawrence Harmon can be reached at harmon@globe.com.
The Boston Globe Opinion, December 17, 2010

 
Themes by Ex Templates Blogger Templates l PC Tablet News l Blogger Pemula